Caleb Williams Goes Out Without a Bang
USC quarterback (QB) Caleb Williams and the Trojans lost to the Bruins 38-20 in a game without much fanfare.
It could be the last time Williams plays for USC depending if he declares for the 2024 NFL Draft.
Granted, he made a couple of nice off-platform throws, one nice deep pass, and three intermediate passes that were on-point. However, outside of that, his performance was nothing special.
Williams ended up losing five of his last six games, which is not what it means to ‘go out on a high note.’ While his supporters are quick to point out that it’s because of the defensive deficiencies and poor play by the offensive line. However, when it comes to looking ahead to the draft, isn’t that the case with teams selecting in the top 10?
I certainly don’t have him graded that high, but that’s where many believe he will be selected if he declares.
On the day, Williams threw 31 completions on 42 attempts (73.8%) for 384 yards with one touchdown and one interception.
That sounds more impressive than it looked.
WATCH CALEB WILLIAMS VS. UCLA BY CLICKING HERE
The Bruins pressured him all game long and his only responses were to either fold under the weight of four sacks or to throw a flurry of short passes, which brings us to the next very important point.
Glorified system QB
I’ve been hammering on this during the season and releasing my independent study after his games, and now the season has concluded versus UCLA, so too has the study.
The results are eye-opening.
Williams had his best game completion percentage this season when USC head coach Lincoln Riley kept him on a short leash throwing between 44-62% short passes. In the games he only threw between 28-32% short passes, his completion percentage plummeted.
What does this tell us?
Williams is a glorified system QB. He depends on a lot of short passes to pad his stats and he has average ball placement at the intermediate to deep route levels. That‘s not elite.
-San Jose State (60% of Williams passes were short-range with a 72% completion percentage).
-Nevada (61% of Williams passes were short-range with a 75% completion percentage).
-Stanford (62% of Williams passes were short-range with a 90.5% completion percentage.)
-ASU (32% of Williams passes were short-range with a 64.5% completion percentage).
-Colorado (60% of Williams passes were short-range with a 75% completion percentage).
-Arizona (28% of Williams passes were short-range with a 56% completion percentage).
-Notre Dame (35% of Williams passes were short-range 62.2% completion percentage)
-Utah (44% of Williams passes were short-range with a 70.6% completion percentage)
–CAL (30% of Williams passes were short-range with 57.5% completion percentage)
-Washington (60% of Williams passes were short-range with 77.1% completion percentage)
-Oregon (35% of Williams passes were short range with a 55.9% completion percentage)
-UCLA (52% of Williams passes were short range with a 73.8% completion percentage)
Glaring tendencies continue
This game concludes me studying Williams in every snap he’s taken in 2022 and 2023. I can now say he has cold hard tendencies to hold the ball too long in the pocket and lock in with receivers.
In other words, his release time and ability to go through his progressions are inconsistent.
That trend continued against UCLA as Williams locked in with intermediate to deep targets five times. He held the ball too long in the pocket four times that I charted.
Generational talent?
Against UCLA, Williams failed to show consistent ‘generational talent’ traits. If anything, he looked reluctant to even be on the field in a ‘meaningless game. His body language looked down throughout the game and I didn’t sense much energy from him.
I’m sorry but running around and playing ‘playground football’ a few times with mixed results doesn’t qualify as the next best thing since sliced bread.
On the bright side, he did a decent job of ball security, with one interception and no PBUs (pass breakups) in this game.
However, after the loss, it was reported Williams refused to talk to reporters, which is nothing but another red flag to add to the stack.
Daniel Kelly is a former NFL Scout with the New York Jets. He was hired on the regime which featured Bill Parcells, Bill Belichick, Scott Pioli, Mike Tannenbaum, and Dick Haley. He is currently the Editor-in-Chief for First Round Mock, contributes at Yardbarker, and has written for Sports Illustrated Lions, Jets, and 49ers, as well as a featured guest on ESPN Radio and Fox Sports Radio. For more information about him visit his website at whateverittakesbook.com. He can be followed on Twitter @firstroundmock.
Featured Articles
Former NFL Scout’s Shocking 2024 First-Round Value Board
Reading Time: 12 minutes Check out a former NFL Scout's top 32 in the 2024 NFL Draft.
Brock Bowers – Skilled and Selfless
Reading Time: 2 minutes First Round Mock's Victoria Jonach checks out Brock Bowers best volunteer work yet.
E = mc2: Jordan Travis, QB, Florida State
Reading Time: 3 minutes Watch five games of FSU QB Jordan Travis embedded into this article.
Spencer Rattler Franchise NFL QB
Reading Time: 3 minutes Watch South Carolina QB Spencer Rattler in 10 games from 2023 embedded into this article.
Jayden Daniels Writes Inspiring Letter
Reading Time: 3 minutes First Round Mock's Victoria Jonach gathers the details of Jayden Daniels' latest letter to his family.
Former NFL Scout ‘100% Chance’ Caleb Williams is a Bust
Reading Time: 3 minutes Find out why a former scout has given USC QB Caleb Williams a 100% chance of being a bust in the NFL.
Oregon QB Bo Nix Puts Up First-Round Game Film
Reading Time: 3 minutes Watch 24 games of Oregon QB Bo Nix embedded into this article and the two attached articles within this article.